Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 02:07:14
Server time: 21:52:45, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: State penalties for blasphemy

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labour Republican Party(LRP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4225

Description[?]:

We should strictly punished people for not respecting God or their fellow citizen's religion!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:35:05, June 11, 2017 CET
From Labour Republican Party(LRP)
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageI ask all parties to vote for this law, including the Social Democratic Party!

Date11:54:33, June 11, 2017 CET
From Social Democratic Party (SDP)
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageFreedom off speech is the cornerstone of our democraty. We will oppose this bill

Date19:08:35, June 11, 2017 CET
From Labour Republican Party(LRP)
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageThe SDP oppose everything that can change this country

Date19:11:58, June 11, 2017 CET
From Social Democratic Party (SDP)
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageThen bring out some useful bills. We are not the only party opposing the LRP's bills.

Date19:51:33, June 11, 2017 CET
From Labour Republican Party(LRP)
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageWhy did you voted against?

Date20:15:05, June 11, 2017 CET
From Liberty Movement
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageThis is a violation of free speech, we will be voting against since we believe that people's freedom should come before other people's sensitivities.

Date20:18:33, June 11, 2017 CET
From Liberty Movement
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageThis is a violation of free speech, we will be voting against since we believe that people's freedom should come before other people's sensitivities.

Date20:18:40, June 11, 2017 CET
From Liberty Movement
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageThis is a violation of free speech, we will be voting against since we believe that people's freedom should come before other people's sensitivities.

Date18:51:43, June 12, 2017 CET
From Republican Party
ToDebating the State penalties for blasphemy
MessageWhy should we violate free speech for blasphemy. This is outrageous

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 295

no
    

Total Seats: 399

abstain
  

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65