We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: State penalties for blasphemy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Republican Party(LRP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4225
Description[?]:
We should strictly punished people for not respecting God or their fellow citizen's religion! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change State penalties for blasphemy
Old value:: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Current: Both private and public blasphemy are considered grave offenses, and are heavily prosecuted.
Proposed: Public blasphemy is considered a criminal offense.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:35:05, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Labour Republican Party(LRP) | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | I ask all parties to vote for this law, including the Social Democratic Party! |
Date | 11:54:33, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Social Democratic Party (SDP) | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | Freedom off speech is the cornerstone of our democraty. We will oppose this bill |
Date | 19:08:35, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Labour Republican Party(LRP) | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | The SDP oppose everything that can change this country |
Date | 19:11:58, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Social Democratic Party (SDP) | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | Then bring out some useful bills. We are not the only party opposing the LRP's bills. |
Date | 19:51:33, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Labour Republican Party(LRP) | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | Why did you voted against? |
Date | 20:15:05, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Liberty Movement | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | This is a violation of free speech, we will be voting against since we believe that people's freedom should come before other people's sensitivities. |
Date | 20:18:33, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Liberty Movement | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | This is a violation of free speech, we will be voting against since we believe that people's freedom should come before other people's sensitivities. |
Date | 20:18:40, June 11, 2017 CET | From | Liberty Movement | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | This is a violation of free speech, we will be voting against since we believe that people's freedom should come before other people's sensitivities. |
Date | 18:51:43, June 12, 2017 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the State penalties for blasphemy |
Message | Why should we violate free speech for blasphemy. This is outrageous |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 295 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 399 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle |