We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administrative
Details
Submitted by[?]: Saridani National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4227
Description[?]:
Time for radical reform in the way our government is run. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Current: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Proposed: Citizenship is granted based on race/religion/gender.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Current: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Proposed: Only those born in this country or to nationals receive nationality.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Racial and religious registration of nationals.
Old value:: The government does not require nationals to register their race or religion.
Current: All nationals are required to register their race and religion.
Proposed: All nationals are required to register their race and religion.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The method used to determine the number of seats each region receives in the national legislature.
Old value:: Equal representation, regardless of region population.
Current: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Proposed: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:21:28, June 13, 2017 CET | From | Liberale vir Seridjan | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | What the reasoning behind it, why do you want this? OOC: try to give us a reason why you want this in the description, easier to debate |
Date | 20:57:08, June 13, 2017 CET | From | Alt-Right Alliance | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | I think only the head of state should be able to propose a cabinet. There needs to be a purpose to winning the Presidency. |
Date | 21:12:06, June 13, 2017 CET | From | Saridani National Party | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | Because then it will be the party with most votes. In the current system you can have the most votes, but not be in government. |
Date | 21:26:57, June 13, 2017 CET | From | Liberale vir Seridjan | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | What about the other proposals than? |
Date | 09:11:26, June 14, 2017 CET | From | Alt-Right Alliance | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | The fairest thing to do, is to let the head of state choose the cabinet. There is no point being elected the head of state and having a cabinet with other parties in it. |
Date | 17:18:04, June 14, 2017 CET | From | Saridani National Party | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | 2 - Saridani citizenship sould be reserved for Saridanis 3 - The government must not give citizenship to untermensch 4 - It is fair that constituencies with more people get more seats 5 - The government needs to keep tabs on people's race/religion |
Date | 20:17:26, June 14, 2017 CET | From | Liberale vir Seridjan | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | We find the proposals of the SNP narrowminded, so we will not support |
Date | 15:49:34, June 16, 2017 CET | From | Konserwatiewe Duntrekkers Partij | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | We find this to be unfair. We believe that everyone can attain citizenship as long as they contribute to our society. |
Date | 16:06:23, June 16, 2017 CET | From | Saridani National Party | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | We disagree, citizenship should be for the great people of Saridan |
Date | 16:06:24, June 16, 2017 CET | From | Saridani National Party | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | We disagree, citizenship should be for the great people of Saridan |
Date | 17:31:25, June 17, 2017 CET | From | Konserwatiewe Duntrekkers Partij | To | Debating the Administrative |
Message | No, one nation under Hosius. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 86 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 148 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 41 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Colonialism or imperialism, as the slave system of the West is called, is not something that is just confined to England or France or the United States. The interests in this country are in cahoots with the interests in France and the interests in Britain. It's one huge complex or combine, and it creates what's known not as the American power structure or the French power structure, but an international power structure. This international power structure is used to suppress the masses of dark-skinned people all over the world and exploit them of their natural resources." Malcolm X |