We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Reshuffle
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4227
Description[?]:
Proposing A Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Conservative Renew
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the National Socialist Workers party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the National Socialist Workers party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Conservative Gaduridos
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Gaduridos First Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Hosian Civic Union
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Gaduridos First Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Conservative Renew
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Gaduridos First Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Gaduridos First Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the National Socialist Workers party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Conservative Renew
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Conservative Renew
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:17:59, June 15, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Reshuffle |
Message | OOC: But why? |
Date | 16:37:35, June 15, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Reshuffle |
Message | OOC: Im probably being dumb but I cant see the difference. |
Date | 16:37:48, June 15, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Reshuffle |
Message | Vote yes anyway though. |
Date | 18:53:25, June 15, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Reshuffle |
Message | OOC: Its just me being dumb sorry - I see the changes now. |
Date | 21:56:31, June 15, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Reshuffle |
Message | Just vote in favour GRP - this bill does not really affect you much at all. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 67 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 434 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney |