We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2063
Description[?]:
| In many areas of Gaduridos, hunting and/or fishing are important to local economies and tourism. It makes no sense for the national government to oversee regulations for those areas when local residents understand the needs of the community and of the local ecosystem best. Therefore, we propose that regulation of hunting and fishing be left to local governments. Further, the ministry of Agriculture is to form a working group on Fisheries, hiring skilled marine biologists to set overall guidelines for local governments when they consider regulations for sustainable fishing. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Current: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Proposed: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:52:07, May 31, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | The national government should allow different hunting and fishing policies in different areas, where the climate and seasons as well as the species will be different. This is best handled at the county level. |
| Date | 02:03:09, June 01, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | We completely disagree with this. Hunting and fishing must be restricted to designated areas and periods as much game also migrates. The local governments cannot protect our wildlife like the national government can. |
| Date | 04:50:05, June 01, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | We support this bill, and would go one step further to completely eliminate all restrictions on hunting. |
| Date | 13:50:54, June 01, 2005 CET | From | Social Democrat Party | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | i agree with the ppp |
| Date | 00:09:20, June 03, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | Just want to see where the votes fall on this one... |
| Date | 00:48:23, June 03, 2005 CET | From | Technophilic Progressive Party | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | We support this bill. Regulations on hunting to depend on the culture and local situation. |
| Date | 05:09:21, June 04, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | I hope the new Congress will respond favourably to this sensible reform. |
| Date | 07:53:17, June 04, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Responsible Hunting and Fishing Act |
| Message | Staying consistant with our past position we will respectfully vote no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 38 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 220 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 93 |
| Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned. |
| Random quote: "Socialism failed because it couldn't tell the economic truth; capitalism may fail because it couldn't tell the ecological truth." Lester Brown, Fortune Brainstorm Conference, 2006 |