Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:24:22
Server time: 02:35:37, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Legitimising appointmwnt of Archbishop Friar.

Details

Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2187

Description[?]:

It has been drawn to my attention that The Archbishop Da vida appointed a minister for religion and not the government going against the law. As it is the wish of the countries most religion focused party for Mr friar to take the position of Archbishop then we move for him to be appointed legitimately appointed by the state, so

Please vote for either of the following

-yes for Mr Friar to be appointed by the state
-no for wanting a different appointment or wishing for the church to chose.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:53:16, February 16, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Legitimising appointmwnt of Archbishop Friar.
MessageWho is mr Friar...

Date17:02:52, February 16, 2006 CET
FromDaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
ToDebating the Legitimising appointmwnt of Archbishop Friar.
Messagehttp://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=47398

'The Archbishop of Tukcity appoints his successor, according to the law. Stop trying to destabilise the power of the church.'

- Archbishop Friar

Date17:09:17, February 16, 2006 CET
FromDaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
ToDebating the Legitimising appointmwnt of Archbishop Friar.
Message'And I'd just like to point out that this bill makes no difference. The second bill means the church would choose - the power of the church, in former Archbishop Gadda DaVida, appointed me as the successor of the church. I was not appointed by the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party. The DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party voted for me as leader in private after The Prophet DaVida announced he would be standing down from both politics and religion.'

- Archbishop Friar

Date21:08:21, February 16, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Legitimising appointmwnt of Archbishop Friar.
Messageyes but the current law states that the archbisdhop is appointed by the government wich changed from the bill proposed in 2177.
We were told he was appointed by the current archbishop.

Date21:17:37, February 16, 2006 CET
FromDaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
ToDebating the Legitimising appointmwnt of Archbishop Friar.
Message'The Archbishop of Tukcity appoints his successor.'

- Archbishop Friar

Date11:28:21, February 17, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Legitimising appointmwnt of Archbishop Friar.
Messagenot according to law. All ministers of religion are appointed by the state. I shall check the laws again but i'm pretty sure i'm right.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 241

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 58


    Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

    Random quote: "The trouble with unemployment is that the minute you wake up in the morning you're on the job." - Slappy White

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 52