We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The National Curriculum Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4228
Description[?]:
The Progressive Liberal Party believes that a private school should have the right to decide what it teaches and how it teaches, and how good the school's measures are should be decided by the students and the parents that send their children to such schools. Thus, we consider the National Curriculum as beneficial but not binding for private schools. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National Curriculum
Old value:: There is a National Curriculum which all government schools are obliged to follow; non-government schools are partially exempt.
Current: There is a National Curriculum which is advisory only and is not binding on any schools.
Proposed: There is a National Curriculum which all government schools are obliged to follow; non-government schools are fully exempt
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:18:14, June 17, 2017 CET | From | Liberal Party (Plaid Ryddfrydol) | To | Debating the The National Curriculum Reform |
Message | We agree with this, but we would like it to go further by making the national curriculum advisory only. Tesni Kendrick, ALP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 279 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 266 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "Terror is only justice: prompt, severe and inflexible; it is then an emanation of virtue; it is less a distinct principle than a natural consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing wants of the country." - Maximilien Robespierre |