We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The National Curriculum Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4228
Description[?]:
| The Progressive Liberal Party believes that a private school should have the right to decide what it teaches and how it teaches, and how good the school's measures are should be decided by the students and the parents that send their children to such schools. Thus, we consider the National Curriculum as beneficial but not binding for private schools. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National Curriculum
Old value:: There is a National Curriculum which all government schools are obliged to follow; non-government schools are partially exempt.
Current: There is a National Curriculum which all schools are obliged to follow.
Proposed: There is a National Curriculum which all government schools are obliged to follow; non-government schools are fully exempt
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:18:14, June 17, 2017 CET | From |  Conservative Party | To | Debating the The National Curriculum Reform |
| Message | We agree with this, but we would like it to go further by making the national curriculum advisory only. Tesni Kendrick, ALP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 279 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 266 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much trouble to put makeup on two faces." - Maureen Murphy |