We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Naming and Ranking Act Resubmission
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hosian Civic Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4229
Description[?]:
| First proposed by the GFP - requires a 2/3 majority to be considered binding (Moderation made that clear) The Federal Cabinet should have Official titles and a line of secession. Prime Minister = Prime Minister Deputy Prime Minister = (Internal Affairs Minister becomes the DPM as well as Internal Affairs Minister) Chancellor of the Exchequer = Minster of Finance Secretary of State for Home Affairs = Business, Innovation, Skills and Trade and Internal Affairs Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs or Foreign Secretary = Foreign Affairs Secretary for Defense = Minister of Defense Attorney General of Justice = Minster of Justice Secretary of State for Education and Culture Secretary of State for Environment, Food, Rural Affairs, and Tourism Minister of State for Transport Minister of State for Health and Social Services Minister of State for Food and Agriculture Chief Secretary of Science and Technology -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If this does not get 2/3 but passes it will be considered non-binding meaning that it is advisory. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:09:34, June 19, 2017 CET | From | Gaduridos Communist Party | To | Debating the Naming and Ranking Act Resubmission |
| Message | I fail to see the need of this... also why is there different names for the same positions? (why science and technology has chief secretary and not a minister...) Also, I think the minister of justice can't be the attorney general, one has executive responsabilities (minister) while the other is an advisor (attorney general), is that not right? One last thing, why are some positions headed by secretary of state, while others are headed by ministers? Sorry if these questions have obvious answers, I think this proposal was based on UK cabinet positions (?) and I don't have much knowledge of that. I'll be voting against this while these questions haven't been answered. I think something more coherent and less confusing would be better. |
| Date | 07:20:17, June 20, 2017 CET | From | Go Gaduridos! [PAG] | To | Debating the Naming and Ranking Act Resubmission |
| Message | We agree with the GCP here. This simply isn't needed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 375 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 55 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 71 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "The radical of one century is the conservative of the next. The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them." - Mark Twain |