Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 01:54:46
Server time: 22:05:13, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): burgerboys | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | HopesFor | JourneyJak | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Terrorist re-education prisons.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationale traditionelle Partei

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4231

Description[?]:

The National Traditionalist Party have decided that terrorists are far to dangerous and toxic to be allowed to mix with other prisoners who are susceptible to radicalisation. This means 4 huge prisons will be constructed, they will be doing 12 hours of labour a day and 3 hours of anti terror propoganda. Prisoners will be kept in separate rooms and won't be allowed to leave until they have changed their views. We are not talking about arresting people for their views but if they are radicalised and the government suggest they are a threat then they should be locked up.
Each prison would cost roughly 59 million to build and 10 million to maintain over 5 years. The total cost will be around 200 million. We appreciate this is a large investment but we assure everyone that it is in our countries best interests.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:51:36, June 20, 2017 CET
FromFreie Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Terrorist re-education prisons.
MessageThe government has a mixed view on your proposal, explain the effectivness, possible Human rights violations, additional costs, and information that would be very useful.
We agree though that we should put them in different prisons for security reasons.

Date23:04:03, June 20, 2017 CET
FromNationale traditionelle Partei
ToDebating the Terrorist re-education prisons.
MessageWe can assure that these will meet satisfactory civil rights laws and only the best will be hired to work there.
I must confess that this is an experiment, we hope it would work and we really think it would. If it didn't then we would be the first to shut them down and reconsider our options. Let me be very clear though, these prisons are for those who are radicalised, not those who have already carried out attacks, we believe that those should be treated very differently.

Date14:51:33, June 21, 2017 CET
FromFreie Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Terrorist re-education prisons.
MessageHow differently?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 100

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

    Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 44