We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protecting Industry from Trade Unions
Details
Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2194
Description[?]:
| dito |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Trade union strike ballots.
Old value:: Trade unions must by law hold a ballot of all members before going on strike, majority approval of those that vote is needed from its members.
Current: Trade unions must by law hold a ballot of all members before going on strike, a majority of all members, regardless of if they vote or not must approve the strike action.
Proposed: Trade unions must by law hold a ballot of all members before going on strike, a majority of all members, regardless of if they vote or not must approve the strike action.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:46:18, February 16, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | 'Aren't Unions banned anyway?' - Archbishop Friar |
| Date | 23:16:27, February 16, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | No but strikes are still illegal. |
| Date | 11:33:09, February 17, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | this would make it more difficult for trade unions to have a negative impact on industry if strikes were made legal. |
| Date | 13:06:31, February 22, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | what do others think? |
| Date | 09:46:27, February 23, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | We are supportive. |
| Date | 21:31:34, February 23, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | We're not, we find this law to be unnecesary |
| Date | 12:32:46, February 25, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | If strikes were to be made legal then it would be more difficult for them to negatively effect industry. |
| Date | 22:21:13, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | vote? |
| Date | 12:34:56, March 02, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Protecting Industry from Trade Unions |
| Message | indeed |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 134 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 111 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 54 |
| Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
| Random quote: "Soldiers who are not afraid of guns, bombs, capture, torture or death say they are afraid of homosexuals. Clearly we should not be used as soldiers; we should be used as weapons." - Letter to the editor, the Advocate |