Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 03:51:08
Server time: 16:08:51, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | Kubrick2 | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Transparency Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Centrist Party of Baltusia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4231

Description[?]:

We propose the following:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:25:20, June 23, 2017 CET
FromPatriotic Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the Transparency Act
MessageMembers of Congress,

I think the key phrase here is "endanger national security". Do we really want to do that?

Pascal Kindler
Home Secretary

Date17:31:01, June 23, 2017 CET
FromSecularist, Socialist Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the Transparency Act
MessageMembers of Congress,

Whilst the phrase "endanger national security" sound extremely important and official and the sort of thing that oughtn't be questioned, I would ask you one question, who decides if the information endangers national security? It has to be the intelligence services which gather the information in the first place. There is no way of knowing that the intelligence services are not withholding information for there own good (ie. if they have performed illegal operations at home or abroad and want to cover up), the only way to hold the intelligence community to account is to know what they're doing and the only way we can do that is by voting yes to this bill and showing said services they are not above the law.

Quinten Belcher (Internal Affairs Spokesperson of the Secularist, Socialist Party of Baltusia)

Date17:52:32, June 23, 2017 CET
FromPatriotic Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the Transparency Act
MessageMr Belcher,

What also isn't clear in this bill is what the set period of time is before files would be released. The current system allows non security risk files to be released after 30 years; a reasonable time frame.

However, if we were to release files that, say, give details on battleship or tank designs or, speaking hypothetically now, intelligence gathered on a lifelong dictator in another country, they may still be "live" files in 30 years. So you can see the sort of situation we could find ourselves in.

As for your concerns with the intelligence community, while I am Home Secretary and they come under my remit, I can assure you there is nothing to worry about.

Pascal Kinder
Home Secretary

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 217

no
    

Total Seats: 304

abstain
  

Total Seats: 79


Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

Random quote: "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again." - Bill O'Reilly

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49