We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Order Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unionist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4231
Description[?]:
| A bill to reform public order regulations |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:21:14, June 23, 2017 CET | From |  Liberal Democratic Party | To | Debating the Public Order Bill |
| Message | Is there a need for this? |
| Date | 21:48:41, June 23, 2017 CET | From | Unionist Party | To | Debating the Public Order Bill |
| Message | Public safety should always be a major concern and it's important that, should the need ever arise, the powers are there to keep people secure. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 106 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 96 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 298 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "We shall fight against them, throw them in prisons and destroy them." - Vladimir Putin |