We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privatisisation Bill 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2192
Description[?]:
| Privatising the post office increasing choice for the public. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office agency in the nation. Private ones are banned.
Current: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:48:10, February 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | We'll oppose the measure. The Post office should only be run by the federal government. |
| Date | 18:59:47, February 17, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | the federal govermental still controls the post office but there is now more choice for our citizens. |
| Date | 19:23:48, February 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | Notice the word ONLY. |
| Date | 10:14:46, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | We oppose. |
| Date | 00:15:34, February 19, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | ok but this still keeps the main power with the government. |
| Date | 09:47:27, February 22, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | !ts okay im gay |
| Date | 14:04:38, February 22, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | Yes, mainpower remains. BUT we havea postal service that is not regulated at all as well that co-exist. And they can do whatever they pleases, that is giving away power from government to the market. |
| Date | 21:27:42, February 23, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | What about allowing private post offices, but regulate them as a compromise? |
| Date | 08:35:36, February 24, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | Good idea |
| Date | 16:31:55, February 24, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | no not a good idea at all. Only the national government should be running the post office. |
| Date | 12:00:15, February 25, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | why? |
| Date | 14:50:45, February 25, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Privatisisation Bill 2 |
| Message | Because they are the only ones capable of running the post office. Not to mention it stream lines everything and it also ensures that the mail really does go through. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 94 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 151 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 54 |
| Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "Any system that takes responsibility away from people, dehumanises them." - Author Unknown |