We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Healthcare Act of 2190
Details
Submitted by[?]: DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2190
Description[?]:
| Let us do away with this socialist healthcare system. A private health system will be more competitive and productive, and will allow us to use tax money more effectively. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:15:29, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | We oppose |
| Date | 15:06:11, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | Opposed. |
| Date | 00:23:41, February 19, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | we could accept if there was public andprivate sectors, as a compromise. |
| Date | 17:40:05, February 19, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | 'Why do you oppose, Rightist and SCP?' - Archbishop Friar |
| Date | 15:27:44, February 20, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | we oppose it cuurently also. |
| Date | 16:36:16, February 20, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | How about now? |
| Date | 18:34:24, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | This we can support |
| Date | 00:24:14, February 22, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | likewise we can support now. We should've done really last time it was proposed. |
| Date | 21:12:46, February 22, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | We'll support it since we were the ones that brough this about the 1st time. If memory also serves me, was opposed by the ONCP when we tried to bring it back. |
| Date | 12:23:11, February 23, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | i just said that in our last lodge. But at the time we were changing our course on the political spectrum so our actions then don't represent our party now. |
| Date | 20:50:17, February 23, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Healthcare Act of 2190 |
| Message | The GLDS are also supporting this, not that it matters very much.. Dr Ulby Szorryboutat |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 299 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli |