We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Limited allowance of animal testing
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cobdenist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2190
Description[?]:
| A human life is more important than an animals. The more tests that can be performed prior to use, the better |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: Animals may not be used for any research.
Current: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Proposed: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:59:11, February 18, 2006 CET | From |  Society of Sadists | To | Debating the Limited allowance of animal testing |
| Message | This is 2187, medicine concentrates on genetic research and computational models. The age of dripping bleach into rabbits eyes by the thousand is long past. Why don't we bring back witchburning? |
| Date | 16:16:43, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Cobdenist Party | To | Debating the Limited allowance of animal testing |
| Message | Nothing will ever replace being able to directly test pharmaceuticals. As the reactions of a physical body to pharmaceuticals and other treatments can never be fully known, it is impossible to know for sure that what a computer says will happen and what will actually happen are one and the same. This bill does allow for registration and regulation, thus we can ensure that such research is only performed when neccessary |
| Date | 16:31:44, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Jesters & Jugglers Party | To | Debating the Limited allowance of animal testing |
| Message | i agree with this bill |
| Date | 19:45:34, February 18, 2006 CET | From | Primus Inter Pares | To | Debating the Limited allowance of animal testing |
| Message | First of all I don't agree with "A human life is more important than an animals." Secondly I think SoS may be right. I will think it over. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 33 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 46 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 21 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle |