We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Vaccine reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Baltusian Left Wing party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4242
Description[?]:
| Individual rights don't matter when it comes to community health. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on vaccinations.
Old value:: The government mandates vaccination for all children, but parents may opt out for religious or ideological reasons.
Current: The government encourages vaccinations for children, but does not enforce them.
Proposed: The government mandates vaccination for all children.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:33:31, July 16, 2017 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Syndicalists | To | Debating the Vaccine reform Bill |
| Message | This bill is to authoritarian in some cases there have been bad batches which have given children conditions like autism some parents hearing this didn't get their children vaccinated on that batch potentially saving them so many people who don't agree to a vaccine most likely only do it once or twice |
| Date | 19:22:40, July 16, 2017 CET | From | Secularist, Socialist Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Vaccine reform Bill |
| Message | There is no link between vaccination and autism nor faulty vaccination and autism |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 96 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 504 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |