We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Security Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Democratic Left
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4244
Description[?]:
| To secure peoples retirements |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 55
Proposed: 50
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:46:24, July 20, 2017 CET | From |  Jacobus | To | Debating the Retirement Security Bill |
| Message | Far too low, does the member not realise the negative effect this would have on the economy. Judging from his party, he does not. |
| Date | 15:07:25, July 20, 2017 CET | From | Unionist Party | To | Debating the Retirement Security Bill |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This would work only to decimate our economy and make our society poorer, unable to live within its means. We cannot support such a heartless change that would harm the very poorest and most vulnerable in society. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 50 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 235 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 65 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx |