Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5474
Next month in: 01:57:39
Server time: 22:02:20, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dnobb | Klexi | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The religious advertising act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likatonian Union of Fascists

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 4245

Description[?]:

Religions should have the right to advertize

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:32:30, July 21, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the The religious advertising act
MessageEither all religions are permitted to promote themselves, or none. Only *some* of them under the government's criteria is unfair and discriminatory.

Date15:11:00, July 21, 2017 CET
FromLikatonian Union of Fascists
ToDebating the The religious advertising act
MessageSo you believe that cults and religions that preach violence against us should have the right to advertise?

Date15:52:21, July 21, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the The religious advertising act
MessagePersonally I agree. No religion preaching violence should be advertised. Now name one religion that doesn't preach violence.

Date17:51:57, July 21, 2017 CET
FromLikatonian Union of Fascists
ToDebating the The religious advertising act
MessageThere may be religions that have violence in them but what is more important is how those that follow their religion act, you don't see christians murdering gays now do you?

Date23:41:24, July 21, 2017 CET
FromNationalist Party of Likatonia
ToDebating the The religious advertising act
MessageEvery religion has extremist, and is highly likely than a homosexual has been killed by a Christian extremist. If the government allows a religion to advertise, but ensures it can't advertise violence, that would be good in our view. However, this does allow for possibly only allowing religions that would favor the majority to advertise. Is forbiding all religious advertising really the answer though?


Date00:02:43, July 22, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the The religious advertising act
MessageAs this seems to be about to pass, as incumbent Secretary of Internal Affairs, and in view of the arguments exposed in this debate, in order to avoid any type of discrimination among religions we will have the following policy regarding requests of religions to advertise:

Any religion that directly opposes violence and does not include violent messages in any piece of propaganda or holy book will be allowed to freely promote itself as any other private business.

~~ Martin Sheckmer, Secretary of Internal Affairs

Date01:40:45, July 23, 2017 CET
FromNationalist Party of Likatonia
ToDebating the The religious advertising act
MessageI commend the Secretary for his non-discrimination action taken.

Ronald G. Steele,
President of the PSPL
Minister of Environment, and tourism

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 163

no
   

Total Seats: 152

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/

    Random quote: "Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself, you can always write a book." - Ronald Reagan

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58