We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Security Council Nomination 4249
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dundorfer Bund der Nationalisten
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4251
Description[?]:
| Dorvik will be able to provide us with assistance in modernising our military and will make a good alliance should anyone attack us. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat A. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Luthori
Current: Dundorf
Proposed: Abstain
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:28:34, July 31, 2017 CET | From | Demokratische Partei Dundorfs | To | Debating the Security Council Nomination 4249 |
| Message | While Dorvik is arguably better positioned to provide military assistance than Malivia, the DNA have failed to provide any evidence of a Dorvish willingness or intention to do so. Simply stating that a country could do something proves nothing. Until the DNA are able to provide a level of concrete assurance in the formal of a formal treaty or otherwise with Dorvik we will not endorse this proposal. Linus Köhler Leader of the FPD |
| Date | 00:41:44, August 01, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Partei | To | Debating the Security Council Nomination 4249 |
| Message | Hang on a second. Let's ask the questions in the reverse. What have the Malivians ever done for us? Where is Malivia's willingness or intention to engage with Dundorf? What kind of "concrete assurance" has Malivia given to Dundorf? We do not recall any substantial diplomatic engagement from Malivia at all. By contrast, Dundorf has a formal treaty of friendship with Dorvik (http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=3667) and a general diplomatic relations treaty with Dorvik (http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2261). And representatives of Dorvik have periodically communicated with Dundorf at many points over the years. We support this proposal, because so far as we can see, Dorvik has simply been a more consistent partner with Dundorf than Malivia has. It would be a slap in the face to that long history of engagement to support Malivia where absolutely no reason to support Malivia has been given. - Svenja Klaußner, foreign affairs spokesperson for the Konservative Partei. |
| Date | 06:29:58, August 01, 2017 CET | From | Demokratische Partei Dundorfs | To | Debating the Security Council Nomination 4249 |
| Message | We thank the KP for providing just explanation for change. Having considered the arguments in favour of supporting Dorvik we will change our vote to yes. Torsten Winkler Leader of the FPD |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 466 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "The liberal state is a mask behind which there is no face; it is a scaffolding behind which there is no building." - Benito Mussolini |