Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5575
Next month in: 03:52:05
Server time: 12:07:54, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Liberals

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 4251

Description[?]:

Mr Speaker

Euthanasia should be legal but not with a court order. A doctor is in a better place to judge this.

Thank u

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:39:44, August 03, 2017 CET
FromMordusia First!
ToDebating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251
MessageEuthanasia is murder. It is simple; allowing doctors to kill off their patients because they have something wrong with them is just cruel. And please explain what happens if the doctor makes a mistake with his identification of a disease and the patient dies from euthanasia. We cannot afford mistakes when it comes to people's lives, it is just plain obvious.

Horace Grumsworth
President of the Tea Party

Date11:28:05, August 03, 2017 CET
FromProgressive Liberals
ToDebating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251
MessageA doctor is a medical graduate. They are in a better place to judge someone's situation then a court. We don't see a judge doing better then a doctor here. In this area a judge is more likely to make a mistake then a doctor.

Progressive Liberals

Date22:01:17, August 03, 2017 CET
FromMordusia First!
ToDebating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251
MessageDo you know how courts work? In this instance the doctor provides the court with evidence and his logical reasoning to why he recommends euthanasia. As there must be 4 jurors who are specialised in health, they are bound to be able identify whether or not this doctor has identified the disease correctly and that euthanasia is the right option. The court system is to give time so that doctors have identified the disease correctly and so that he doesn't make a mistake.

Kingsley Smith
Minister of Health and Social Services

Date23:16:27, August 03, 2017 CET
FromCommunist Party
ToDebating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251
MessageThe TP seem to position themselves as a party which celebrates freedom of choice, but wishes to make it difficult for people who wish to die humanely. I would trust the patient and the doctor over a lengthy court case any day.

Date23:16:27, August 03, 2017 CET
FromCommunist Party
ToDebating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251
MessageThe TP seem to position themselves as a party which celebrates freedom of choice, but wishes to make it difficult for people who wish to die humanely. I would trust the patient and the doctor over a lengthy court case any day.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 179

no
    

Total Seats: 482

abstain
 

Total Seats: 89


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State." - Vladimir Lenin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56