We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Liberals
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4251
Description[?]:
Mr Speaker Euthanasia should be legal but not with a court order. A doctor is in a better place to judge this. Thank u |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is only allowed with consent from the patient and a court order.
Current: Euthanasia is illegal but not considered murder.
Proposed: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:39:44, August 03, 2017 CET | From | Mordusia First! | To | Debating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251 |
Message | Euthanasia is murder. It is simple; allowing doctors to kill off their patients because they have something wrong with them is just cruel. And please explain what happens if the doctor makes a mistake with his identification of a disease and the patient dies from euthanasia. We cannot afford mistakes when it comes to people's lives, it is just plain obvious. Horace Grumsworth President of the Tea Party |
Date | 11:28:05, August 03, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Liberals | To | Debating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251 |
Message | A doctor is a medical graduate. They are in a better place to judge someone's situation then a court. We don't see a judge doing better then a doctor here. In this area a judge is more likely to make a mistake then a doctor. Progressive Liberals |
Date | 22:01:17, August 03, 2017 CET | From | Mordusia First! | To | Debating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251 |
Message | Do you know how courts work? In this instance the doctor provides the court with evidence and his logical reasoning to why he recommends euthanasia. As there must be 4 jurors who are specialised in health, they are bound to be able identify whether or not this doctor has identified the disease correctly and that euthanasia is the right option. The court system is to give time so that doctors have identified the disease correctly and so that he doesn't make a mistake. Kingsley Smith Minister of Health and Social Services |
Date | 23:16:27, August 03, 2017 CET | From | Communist Party | To | Debating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251 |
Message | The TP seem to position themselves as a party which celebrates freedom of choice, but wishes to make it difficult for people who wish to die humanely. I would trust the patient and the doctor over a lengthy court case any day. |
Date | 23:16:27, August 03, 2017 CET | From | Communist Party | To | Debating the Euthanasia Bill - PL - January 4251 |
Message | The TP seem to position themselves as a party which celebrates freedom of choice, but wishes to make it difficult for people who wish to die humanely. I would trust the patient and the doctor over a lengthy court case any day. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 179 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 482 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 89 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State." - Vladimir Lenin |