We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Tokundski Nacionalisti
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2190
Description[?]:
We feel that all parties should be permitted the chance to propose cabinets, otherwise we have the current situation, where a cabinet stagnates, does not have all of its posiiton filled, and is generally useless. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:10:55, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Workers' Communist Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals |
Message | Agreed. |
Date | 18:12:58, February 20, 2006 CET | From | Zapatista Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals |
Message | Dont agree. The goverment has no roll. Lets give the goverment SOMETHING to do. |
Date | 13:31:13, February 21, 2006 CET | From | Tokundski Nacionalisti | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals |
Message | he Cabinet is the government, as such it has the Foreign, Prime and Finance Ministry options, plus the other Ministries can all RP their actions. ZP, if we are going to have the current situation where only the HoS can propose cabinets, at least propose some. |
Date | 02:44:17, February 23, 2006 CET | From | Modern Economic Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals |
Message | Agree |
Date | 01:53:21, February 24, 2006 CET | From | Zapatista Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals |
Message | OK. We can agree to that. But then just after every election we have people proposing a million useless cabinets! Its worthless. However, in favour of making the game more interesting for ALL parties, we will vote for. |
Date | 01:54:56, February 24, 2006 CET | From | Zapatista Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals |
Message | No. Actually, change of mind. Theirs too many military and aristocrat parties. We prefer these NOT to get into power and wipe out equality or our workers and drag us into some pointless war! Against. |
Date | 18:28:32, February 24, 2006 CET | From | Workers' Communist Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform - Cabinet Proposals |
Message | There is no equality when the nation is ruled by Communists! (unless making everyone in Cobura live in squallor counts as "equality") |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 213 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 250 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 37 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "A son can bear with equanimity the loss of his father, but the loss of his inheritance may drive him to despair." - Niccolo Machiavelli |