We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Loi sur la réforme militaire
Details
Submitted by[?]: Reconstruire l'ancien (RA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4255
Description[?]:
| Military should not be the only thing Aldurie should be proud off, the defence ministry believes that military intervention is at the bottom of the list and there is no reasoning for spending money on a huge military. We need to restrict our military. If passed, we will amend the budget in accordance with this legislation |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the South Seleyan Defensive Alliance.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government does not allow arms to be exported.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:34:01, August 10, 2017 CET | From | Parti libéral de bon sens | To | Debating the Loi sur la réforme militaire |
| Message | We cannot give our support to article 1 and 6. Both measures will damage diplomatic relations with our allies and threaten our security. However when it come to nuclear and chemical weaponry, I give credit to the LOP of taking this brave step in showing the other nations of Terra that Nuclear retraction must be a global goal. We should put that measure to the world congress. |
| Date | 18:39:45, August 10, 2017 CET | From | Front Gauche (FG) | To | Debating the Loi sur la réforme militaire |
| Message | Absolutely |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 249 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 331 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 70 |
| Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
| Random quote: "The problem is big government. If whoever controls government can impose his way upon you, you have to fight constantly to prevent the control from being harmful. With small, limited government, it doesn't much matter who controls it, because it can't do you much harm." - Harry Browne |