We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.l. 05/4260 - Incestous Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alleanza Radicale - NCD
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4261
Description[?]:
| Lavinia Siri, LP: "We should not persecute these people, like if they murdered someone. We cannot allow obviously the recognition of such behavior, the social and health implication are clear. Thank you" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on incest.
Old value:: Incestuous acts are illegal, but only actively prosecuted if pregnancy results.
Current: Incestuous acts are illegal.
Proposed: Incestuous acts are legal, but incestuous marriages are not legally recognised.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:41:07, August 22, 2017 CET | From | Partito Nazionale Democratico | To | Debating the P.d.l. 05/4260 - Incestous Act |
| Message | Franco Ricollo, AI Leader, So should pregnancy result, the tax payer has to pay for any potential health problems this child has due to incest? No thank you. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 409 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 142 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 84 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |