Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5481
Next month in: 03:10:39
Server time: 00:49:20, May 11, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Infrastructure Security Budget Raise of 4270

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4271

Description[?]:

As per the Infrastructure Security Act, I have proposed an additional two billion dollars annually to address the concerns facing our country.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:57:34, September 12, 2017 CET
From Liberal Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Security Budget Raise of 4270
MessageMr Speaker,

We believe that this is a necessary increase of funding to secure our Nation's infrastructure.

Date04:44:01, September 12, 2017 CET
FromWhig Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Security Budget Raise of 4270
MessageMr. Speaker, to honor the Infrastructure Security Act we in the GCU support this budget increase for the Infrastructure and Transport Ministry

GCU Minority Whip

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 388

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
         

    Total Seats: 362


    Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

    Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 46