We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.l. 01/4277 - Education Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: PRO - Cittadini Progressisti
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4277
Description[?]:
| Honoured Parliamentarians, The current education legislation gives non-governmental schools the opportunity to teach whatever they want, leading to cases of schools teaching their students the bare minimum or don't even teach at all. The Ministry of Education has recieved a lot of complaints from concerned parents all over the Republic. Rural areas are dealing with schools that dont teach subjects like math or Istalian anymore, but just have the students copy sentences of the board to fill the time they're required to be in school. This should stop immedeately. Regards, Seyma el-Fayat, Minister of Education and Culture. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National Curriculum
Old value:: There is a National Curriculum which all government schools are obliged to follow; non-government schools are fully exempt
Current: There is no National Curriculum; the curriculum is set by the schools themselves.
Proposed: There is a National Curriculum which all schools are obliged to follow.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on political education
Old value:: The Government has no specific policy on political education.
Current: The Government has no specific policy on political education.
Proposed: The Government requires all secondary school students to receive a basic political education.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:37:21, September 24, 2017 CET | From | Partito Nazionale Democratico | To | Debating the P.d.l. 01/4277 - Education Reforms |
| Message | Franco Ricollo, AI Leader, This is just done, for the children to be indoctrinated into the left wing! If it would be the AI proposing such a bill, whilst holding the ministry, you would bash us! We urge all parties tp vote against such hipocrisy! |
| Date | 18:03:09, September 24, 2017 CET | From | PRO - Cittadini Progressisti | To | Debating the P.d.l. 01/4277 - Education Reforms |
| Message | Seyma el-Fajat, Minister of Education and Culture: No we would most certainly not. The AVP has always been in favour of a National Curriculum and our dislike against the AI is not big enough to vote against bills that we actually agree with. |
| Date | 18:27:43, September 24, 2017 CET | From | Nuova Unione | To | Debating the P.d.l. 01/4277 - Education Reforms |
| Message | Vito Cedrone, FR Chairperson We will have to hold ourselves from voting, because, although we support the first article, we strongly oppose the second, as it will likely hurt our education, generalizing our program. |
| Date | 18:34:19, September 24, 2017 CET | From | Partito degli Agricoltori - NCD | To | Debating the P.d.l. 01/4277 - Education Reforms |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We vote in favor for this bill because we think that all students should have some basic neutral political education Angelina Bucatti MP PdA Education expert |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 122 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 166 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 67 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |