Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:17:08
Server time: 19:42:51, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom of Religion Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Grüne Demokratische Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4281

Description[?]:

NPB Bill

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:15:51, October 01, 2017 CET
FromGrüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Bill
MessageThis bill protects the right of every man, woman and child to choose their own religion and display it proudly. If I wish to wear a cross in this assembly, or an ahmadi wishes to wear a head-scarf, then that is their right. Furthermore, the taxation of organisations of faith is immoral and disgusting. We also need to allow schools to choose what is best for their children.

Catharina Richter
Leader of the NPB

Date13:37:25, October 01, 2017 CET
FromAlternative für Dorvik
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Bill
MessageThis is too broad!

Date14:05:06, October 01, 2017 CET
FromLiberale Partei
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Bill
MessageMr.Speaker,

We strongly agree with the NPB in the fact that wearing religious symbols should not be regulated.

Paul Weber,
Leader of the Free Democratic Party

Date14:58:05, October 01, 2017 CET
FromGrüne Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Freedom of Religion Bill
MessageThe AfD think you should not be able to express yourself and that charitable donations should be taxed. Shameful.

Catharina Richter
Leader of the NPB

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 288

no
   

Total Seats: 311

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "The right to suffer is one of the joys of a free economy." - Howard Pyle (commenting on unemployment in Detroit)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 65