Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 02:09:27
Server time: 17:50:32, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hexaus18 | HopesFor | Probax | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: DNU Plan V

Details

Submitted by[?]: Bloc Socialiste

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2191

Description[?]:

DNU Plan V

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:11:57, February 23, 2006 CET
FromNational Progressive Party
ToDebating the DNU Plan V
MessageOur history is our gift to our children. I agree

Date03:46:02, February 24, 2006 CET
FromBloc Socialiste
ToDebating the DNU Plan V
MessageMy friend, it appears as if you voted no to this bill (by accident, perhaps).

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 623

no
 

Total Seats: 127

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected." - Will Rogers

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48