We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Water Pollution Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4288
Description[?]:
We all know climate change is a hoax made by Yingdala, but my personal research shows that water pollution is also a hoax! Yingdala wants to crush our economy! in the name of the Beluzian people, agree to this bill! if not the people will vote you out! slackers! -Yopesco Yocazo Yocosecho, candidate for food and agriculture of the National Opposition Union. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Current: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Proposed: The government does not regulate the quality of drinking water.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:13:05, October 14, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the Water Pollution Act |
Message | “We all know that climate change, and water pollution is real, in fact the only thing you mentioned that is lie is this fictional country called Yingdala.” Jess Young Party Congressional Leader United Party |
Date | 03:52:41, October 14, 2017 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Water Pollution Act |
Message | We would like to ask the National Opposition Union where in a encyclopedia can we find Yingdala? And on what basis can you place the blame for our country's problems on foreign countries when they themselves are having troubles on their own? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 251 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 227 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 272 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Conservatism, however, is too often a welcome excuse for lazy minds, loath to adapt themselves to fast changing conditions." - Sigmund Freud |