Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 01:38:30
Server time: 10:21:29, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | Freemarket21 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Official Separation of Church and State

Details

Submitted by[?]: Proletariat Revolution Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2063

Description[?]:

To respect the diversity of our people, we shall not have any political ties between the state and religion. The state, for the sake of our people's civil rights, shall remain secular.

The people of Likaton are free to practice whatever religion that they feel is right for them. The state shall have no say in the matter, as it is personal.

The only time that the goverment will end any religious activity is if there is any form of human rights breaches/violations.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:26:56, June 03, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageNo we should not inforce a Religeon on our 'people' bu somethings should be discouraged.

Date16:27:27, June 03, 2005 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageThat's true. maybe no human or animal sacrifices? Or anything that violates human rights?

Date03:22:42, June 04, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageThis is really vague- please come up with something a little more specific. 'No ties between State and Religion' can mean a lot of different things based on who you're talking to...

For example does it mean that the use of religious symbols in emblems is forbidden? Even if they have always been there as part of our culture/heritage?

Date06:24:33, June 04, 2005 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageI just said political ties. I say nothing about outlawing emblems.

Date13:46:35, June 04, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageDoes that mean that no one who is or was in a leadership position of a religious body can run for office?
Good.

Date21:51:30, June 04, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageNo, that wouldnt make sense. No official ties, eg head of state=head of church, or condonement of one religion over another, i agree, but i dont agree with actually forbidding the two to mix.

Date03:18:17, June 05, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageI know. That was somewhat sarcastic.
Perhaps we'll compromise. No one who holds a leadership position in a church can run for office. They can still run for office, but they must relinguish their former position.

That wouldn't prevent religious ideals from mixing. It's just a... 'good faith' appeal.

Date04:41:31, June 05, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Official Separation of Church and State
MessageI think this is fair -
bring it to vote..

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 111

no
 

Total Seats: 26

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved.

    Random quote: "If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago." - George Porter

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64