We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Act of 4288
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pancildanian Socialist Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4289
Description[?]:
| Act of 4288 |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:50:39, October 17, 2017 CET | From |  Pancildanian Socialist Movement | To | Debating the Act of 4288 |
| Message | This law ensures the founding of National Defence Systems S.A. (NDS SA) which is responsible for the production and the sell of weapons. |
| Date | 20:06:44, October 17, 2017 CET | From | Cildanian Labour And People's Party | To | Debating the Act of 4288 |
| Message | More restrictions on gun rights. The State Should Not have control over Selling Weapons Entirely Some State Defence Industries Should Exist But Private Industries Should Exist As Well As People May question The Government's Sudden Takeover Of All Defence Industries That Is My View On The Subject |
| Date | 22:06:10, October 17, 2017 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Act of 4288 |
| Message | This means government controls all weapons and ammunition production. The private sector will give us better weapons and ammunition at a cheaper cost. Also, what PPC said, the state should not own the industries because then they have the ability to stop manufacturing weapons for civilian use, a major infringement on gun rights. |
| Date | 04:13:44, October 18, 2017 CET | From | International Militarist Party | To | Debating the Act of 4288 |
| Message | Private company's are not responsible enough to control are defense, the government should control it so that private corporation don't make stupid decisions with are weapons. |
| Date | 05:13:53, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Act of 4288 |
| Message | The government is the only ones making stupid decisions with our weapons. If private companies mess up, they lose money, so they naturally have more of an incentive to handle them safely. The government controlling the weapons means they control who gets guns, and that's a dangerous infringement on the right to bear arms. |
| Date | 17:19:06, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Cildanian Labour And People's Party | To | Debating the Act of 4288 |
| Message | And With The New Gun Control Act. Less Shady Work Can Go On With Private Companies As There Can Be Jail Time For Those Kind Of Acts Now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 37 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 154 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 109 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |