We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 4288
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partido Nacional de Bentara
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4289
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Partido Nacional de Bentara
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 4
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Partido Nacional de Bentara
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Social Democratic Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Partido Nacional de Bentara
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Social Democratic Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Partido Nacional de Bentara
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Social Democratic Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:04:35, October 17, 2017 CET | From | Communist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | This is symbolic of a hunger for power and of greedy zealots. It is an affront to democracy and the will of the people that the largest party is excluded from the cabinet. Clearly there is a regressive, desperate desire to retain the corrupt and stagnant status quo. We will not forget this political stitch up by a bunch of undemocratic centrists and nor will the people of Gaduridos who have had their voice ignored simply because they wanted change. |
Date | 21:42:02, October 17, 2017 CET | From | Socialist Republican Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | The will of the people must always win against the reactionaries. |
Date | 16:09:45, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Partido Nacional de Bentara | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | 24.37% doesn't sound like the will of the people to me. |
Date | 16:22:07, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Communist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | Being the party with the most seats is a good indicator of popularity. Of all the parties we have the biggest mandate to be of the government. |
Date | 16:22:57, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Communist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | To go out of your way to exlclude the largest party also indicate undemocratic credentials. The Communist Party would never act in such a childish and petty manner. |
Date | 17:04:43, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Socialist Republican Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | Even the Social Democratic Party who stood to gain from this voted against it. |
Date | 20:04:42, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Partido Nacional de Bentara | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | Three-quarters of the population looked at the Communist platform and said "we would prefer democratic and free governance". If the Communists are such democratic idealists, they will realise they have no mandate. |
Date | 21:32:02, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Communist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4288 |
Message | From these bizarre comments we can only conclude that the PNB leadership is deluded. The Communist Party has never criticised democracy - in fact we have only spoken in favour of it. The truth is it is your party that wants to exclude a particular party from government - the party which received more votes than any other. PNB is the anti-democratic party here. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 100 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 281 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 119 |
Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |