We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nationalist Act 429X
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4299
Description[?]:
In order to simplify the judicial process, we propose: |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are no courts, the Head of State will determine what's right or wrong.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right to appeal against a judgement rendered by a court.
Old value:: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Current: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Proposed: All judgements are final and binding; appealing against them is not possible.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy with respect to the death penalty.
Old value:: The death penalty is not applied, except for terrorism, treason and crimes against mankind.
Current: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Proposed: Religious doctrine determines the death penalty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:10:04, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Freedom Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Nationalist Act 429X |
Message | This is an outrageous bill as it allows for the leader who may biases in the case the final decision which is an outrage of justice compared to a trial in a court and making all judgments final and binding is a direct violation of the legal right of appealing to a higher court for review of any biases and we should always keep religion out of government decisions to prevent a theocracy |
Date | 16:19:01, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Freedom Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Nationalist Act 429X |
Message | Mr.Speaker, This bill if passed will lead us on a path toward a authoritarian government with no place for the prevail of justice Nudd Vilhjálmsson- Candidate for Minister of Justice |
Date | 21:13:35, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Lodamese Democratic Progressive Party | To | Debating the Nationalist Act 429X |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The judicial system we have currently is working fine. Our party will not support this move toward an authoritarian judicial process. Tenus Maternus, Lodamun Minister of Justice |
Date | 07:49:12, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Nationalist Act 429X |
Message | Mr. Speaker, as the President is chosen by the people, he can make such decisions on behalf of the people. Obviously, the President has to act in accordance with law, he is not free to act as he pleases. Anja Demuzere Minister of Internal Affairs |
Date | 10:53:29, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Nationalist Act 429X |
Message | Mr. Speaker, LNC will not be putting this proposal to vote under the current circumstances. We respect the reasoning of the other active parties. Carolus Brogni President of Lodamun Representative of LNC |
Date | 15:41:30, November 07, 2017 CET | From | Lodamun Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Nationalist Act 429X |
Message | Mr Speaker This is a headlong assault on the due process we all depend on for our protection. It is a step towards arbitrary power and dictatorship. Rida Baulmer LDP - Justice |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 213 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 310 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 76 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine." - George Washington |