Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5482
Next month in: 00:01:50
Server time: 11:58:09, May 13, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): echizen | Infinite | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase

Details

Submitted by[?]: Statsråd Parti

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2191

Description[?]:

The Statsråd Parti propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Kazulianisk kungariket. We will still have a massive surplus even after this.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:43:15, February 24, 2006 CET
FromStatsråd Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageViva La Defence Spending!

Date19:49:28, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageNah, also because NRA want to change the taxes, then this could generate deficit.

And, when we have a new cabinet?

Date19:51:43, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKonservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageWhy do we need a new cabinet? The current cabinet still functions, and has a massive majority.

Date19:52:12, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKonservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageAnd we support this proposal, although spending is still far too igh in some areas.

Date19:56:00, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageThe current cabinet not functions, since it had not make anything.

Date20:01:48, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKonservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageBut it still has all of its Ministers, and a budget proposal has been made, what else does the cabinet have to do? To the best of my knowledge no-one has asked the FM to bring any Treaties to vote? And more bills are voted upon now than before the current cabinet came to power? So what are you on about?

Date20:06:13, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKlassiskt Liberala Partiet
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
Messagewe will not support any raise in our budget.

Date20:06:19, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageBudget proposal is not a prerogative of cabinet. And we prefer to have a proportional representation of parties, in order to know how your coalition is made.

Date20:16:39, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKonservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageWhat do you have to do with a Cabinet that has nothing to do with you? So stop moaning. And secondly you moan that cabinet has not made anything, what can be made then, that would make you happy?

Date20:40:14, February 24, 2006 CET
FromStatsråd Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageConsidering the wide range of opinions already on show, this shall go to voting.

Date21:11:21, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageWell, at least make a press conference about changment to a monarchy.

Date21:24:29, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKonservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageSo ask the Foreign or Prime Ministers to do so.

Date22:08:20, February 24, 2006 CET
FromKSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
Messagewhy we must remember to FM which are his duties? We are the opposition, it seems

Date00:01:42, February 25, 2006 CET
FromRadikale Folkeparti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageThen why are you moaning?

Date00:03:36, February 25, 2006 CET
FromKSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageWe had only noted the inactivity of the current cabinet.

Date07:14:09, February 25, 2006 CET
FromNy Alternativ Revolusjonær
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageI'm all for an increased military budget, but not in a way that will be the end of all of us.

Date12:07:40, February 25, 2006 CET
FromNorthern Light
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageFascist ! Fascists everywhere!!!
Help Help! I'm being repressed!

Date18:43:06, February 25, 2006 CET
FromFreedom Fighter Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessageAren't we supposed to be a peace-loving nation? Why not spend that money elsewhere , where it could be used to help save lives rather than end them? NO all the way

Date22:36:06, February 25, 2006 CET
FromKonservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Budget proposal of October 2190 - Defence Spending Increase
MessagePeace loving? Who came up with that?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 26

no
      

Total Seats: 73

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

    Random quote: "I have opinions of my own - strong opinions. But I don't always agree with them." - George W. Bush

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 93