Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:23:04
Server time: 18:36:55, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: DRP Religious Clarification Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Republican Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2191

Description[?]:

This bill is to show the people the DRP's position on Religious Policy Reform.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:05:23, February 24, 2006 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the DRP Religious Clarification Act
MessageWe would have supported article 1 but not the rest.

Date05:23:13, February 25, 2006 CET
FromPeoples Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the DRP Religious Clarification Act
MessageAll we can say about this is the following:

1) Religion will NEVER be a predominate issue in the politcal arena so long as the PRP are able to stand up for the equality of ALL religions.

2) The Seperation of Church and State will be maintained. We the State need not to help religion and we do not need to encourage it.

3) This is a breach of civil liberties and we of the PRP can not believe that such action has been taken by the DRP.

4) We of the PRP will never support any form of Nationalized Religion as we will not particapate in the creation of a Fundementalist state where Religion is regarded above the civil liberties of the people.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
           

    Total Seats: 274

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 19


    Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

    Random quote: "History is made by angry minorities, not by passive majorities." - Fareed Zakaria

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 78