Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:47:16
Server time: 11:12:43, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dannypk19 | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Income tax proposal of December 2190

Details

Submitted by[?]: Tirgith Populus Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2191

Description[?]:

The Trigunia Capitalist Party propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Republic of Trigunia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:12:52, February 25, 2006 CET
From Tirgith Populus Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of December 2190
MessageThis will reduce the burden on the less foutunate citizens and allow for more government spending in defense and education.

Date22:15:55, February 25, 2006 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of December 2190
MessageNo, this INCREASES the burden on the least fortunate citizens (people surviving on less than TRA1590 will pay more tax than under the current system). It also means that anyone living on between TRA1,000 and TRA1,430 who currently does not pay any tax would have to start paying tax. Either these people are extremely poor, in which case why should we tax them, or they are not poor, in which case why are you pretending to worry about the 'less fortunate citizens'?

What you meant to say was that this decreases the burden on the middle class, although even for them, their maximum gain under your tax proposal is is about TRA49/year (for someone earning TRA5,000), whereas someone earning TRA1,430/year would be paying an extra TRA22/year. Put another way, the people who can least afford the tax are having their taxes raised to subsidise people who can better afford the tax.

Add to the fact, that there is no way we need an overall tax increase AT ALL when we are sitting on a TRA2bn/year surplus and are spending obscene amounts of money on things that the government really has no business in at all, like trade and industry (i.e., subsidies and support for special interests), environment and tourism, food and agriculture and science and technology. On top of that, do we REALLY need to be spending TRA5.5bn on justice every year? That's 78% of what we currently spend on defence. What are we arming our coppers with that we need to spend 78% of what we spend on our tanks and battleships and fighter planes on policemen? Similarly finance is getting TRA4bn every year. Where is that money going?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 213

no
   

Total Seats: 238

abstain
  

Total Seats: 104


Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

Random quote: "Aristocracy and exclusiveness tend to final overthrow, in language as in politics." - W. D. Whitney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 92