Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 01:13:48
Server time: 18:46:11, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): JourneyJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 4293

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Populist Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4294

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:49:59, October 26, 2017 CET
FromPeople's Populist Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageThis is the proper one

Date23:58:35, October 26, 2017 CET
FromPirate Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageThe PPF said this about anarchism I a previous cabinet proposal: "Anarchism, whilst potentially appealing in theory, doesn't work in practice. Truth hurts I know, but still you have to face the cold hard facts"... Yet now they're proposing to work with Kafe Commune which describes itself as "anarchist" and "anarcho-communist" - what has changed for the PPF? Do they now support anarchism?

Date00:42:48, October 27, 2017 CET
FromPeople's Populist Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageI have removed you from the cabinet as requested, I have mended errors committed on the previous proposal, so you have nothing to complain about

Date10:42:40, October 27, 2017 CET
FromPirate Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageI said I wouldn't work with anarchists and anarcho-communists but I didn't say that I don't want to be in government. What I did say is that if you'd have tried a National Party-PPF-NCP coalition probably would have passed by now...

Date04:18:45, October 28, 2017 CET
FromPeople's Populist Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageWell maybe when you're in government you can make these decisions. But i'm going with this

Date11:34:40, October 28, 2017 CET
FromPirate Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageYour proposal was defeated again

Date20:40:34, October 28, 2017 CET
FromPeople's Populist Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageOnly because the national party couldn't be asked to vote. You've caused enough problems as it is. That is precisely why I am not letting you in this cabinet. There is no technical reason I should allow you in this cabinet anyway, since you're the second smallest party

Date22:14:23, October 28, 2017 CET
FromPirate Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4293
MessageI've only tried to help you get a cabinet passed. If you have included my party you'd have gotten the votes to get it passed.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 289

no
 

Total Seats: 130

abstain
     

Total Seats: 331


Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner.

Random quote: "We can only protect liberty by making it relevant to the modern world." - Tony Blair

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59