We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: United Workers Alliance
Details
Submitted by[?]: Peoples Revolutionary Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2192
Description[?]:
A bill that will aid all workers across Hutori. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: The government denies subsidy assistance to farmers.
Current: The government allows local governments to craft agricultural subsidy policy.
Proposed: The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Proposed: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign investments.
Old value:: Foreign investors may freely invest in national companies.
Current: Foreign investors need to obtain government approval for all investments in national companies.
Proposed: Foreign investors may invest in national companies, but may not get a majority share.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:27:31, February 25, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the United Workers Alliance |
Message | Articles 1 & 2 we will ocnsider when hell freezes over. Article 3 wont even get thought about then! |
Date | 18:30:25, February 25, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the United Workers Alliance |
Message | PS your bill description is a lie! It will not aid workers it will ensure they are all fired! What wil happen is that if this looks like passing every company will immediately switch all it's labour to monthly ocntracts or leave the nation. Jobs for life is not possible, what happens if a worker steals the salary for the workers? The management cannot even fire him under article 2! We suggest you remove your communist tinted spectacles, breathe in some real world and plug in a brain! |
Date | 19:45:16, February 25, 2006 CET | From | Democratic-Republican Party | To | Debating the United Workers Alliance |
Message | We must agree with the Libertarians partially. While we support Article I fully, Article II means that if a union strikes "just for the Hell of it", they can't be fired. We think that, with a good reason, they should be able to fire striking workers (although restricted, so that they cannot just fire striking workers who strike for health care or some other thing). Also, there really is no problem with foreigners owning parts of our companies, at least not that we see. Our only problem would be if a foreign GOC controlled our corporations. |
Date | 06:15:37, February 26, 2006 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the United Workers Alliance |
Message | Which can happen if left unchecked and unregulated. |
Date | 07:06:28, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Hutori Freedom Party | To | Debating the United Workers Alliance |
Message | We can support article I. However, the second two articles are unacceptible. We believe in buisness regulation, but we also believe in free trade. |
Date | 08:14:54, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the United Workers Alliance |
Message | Cannot support any of these: Article I - nearly all farmers are low income so in actual fact you are going to be bailing them all out. You're already giving them piles of benefits, why give them more? Article II - is just plain ridiculous. How is anybody meant to run a business if they are striking every 2 minutes? Article III - Ha!! |
Date | 12:39:40, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Northern Lights | To | Debating the United Workers Alliance |
Message | we cannot support article 1. taxes should be used to fund essential services and not to redistribute incomes. direct welfare payments should not be used to save failing businesses and paying people for activities the community does not need, but to fight poverty by giving people equal chance to contribute to the wealth of the society (like funding education, health, etc.). we give articles 2 and 3 nothing but a laugh. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 85 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 225 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 20 |
Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "Envy is the cause of political division." - Democritus |