Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5476
Next month in: 00:20:35
Server time: 19:39:24, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cooperatives Legalisation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4299

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:30:22, November 07, 2017 CET
From Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Cooperatives Legalisation Act
MessageRepresentatives,

The cooperative movement in this country has a long tradition, at times democratic management has been required by law. As you know, that is a policy backed by the DSPR. But we do not seek to realise that aim today. Today we seek only to end the ban on democratic management. This ban was recently introduced by a fading Whig administration afraid of the growing influence of the workers' councils.

We hope that reasonable members can see that this ban has no possible justification. The Whigs make a great deal of their commitment to the 'free market'. But if you or I wanted to set up a company tomorrow, using a model of cooperative rather than private ownership, that would not be allowed! This is the Whigs acting purely in their class interest. The ban must go.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 460

no
  

Total Seats: 202

abstain
 

Total Seats: 88


Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 42