We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvische Sozial Nationale Volkspartei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4305
Description[?]:
Legalising paramilitary's will allow our state to be protected in case of a enemy incursion. When our military is disabled or taken down we can rely on paramilitary's to ensure our chance of keeping our nation together will remain high. Ofcourse these paramilitaries should be regulated and monitored so none of them may cross the line. This will be done by the government. Arnold Sweindracht, TGP Chairman for the Rat |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Current: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are allowed but are heavily regulated by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:50:52, November 17, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Sozial Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | OOC: Damn fucked up the name *legalisation sorry |
Date | 20:54:13, November 17, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | A bizarre and stupid idea, which would undoubtedly lead to armed rebellion. There is no way that our military will simply be 'taken down'. By allowing political armies, you don't help defend our country. Why not just invest more in our military? Why risk our national safety for an impossible circumstance? Käthe Grunebaum Minister of Internal Affairs |
Date | 20:55:13, November 17, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Sozial Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | These organizations would be heavily regulated by the government. Which will make sure no armed rebellion could ever take place as the government could intervene when necessary. Edmund Treitschke, President of Dorvik |
Date | 22:06:02, November 17, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | But if the military is 'taken down', the paramilitaries can do whatever they want! They can join our invaders and help kill us! And may I just state that this is the least like scenario of all time. You're acting actually more insane that Mr Balloon Man from the DKP, I mean it's crazy. The idea that one of the best militaries in the world can just be destroyed is fanciful. There is nobody that could or would invade us and destroy our military. Hulstria certainly couldn't. Why not just invest in the military? Why risk armed rebellion? Käthe Grunebaum Minister of Internal Affairs |
Date | 00:17:05, November 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Kommunistische Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | Mr. Chairman, This is a highly irresponsible proposal that would create a serious risk of civil unrest on the streets. There should be no place for paramilitary organisations in Dorvik. Anton Weinreich Chairman of the Dorvish Communist Party |
Date | 00:41:48, November 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | The Communists would probably form an uprising. Let’s make Dorvik’s national military stronger, not give it to our enemies. Alex Gluck Defence Minister NP High Chancellor |
Date | 00:49:04, November 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Kommunistische Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | Mr. Chairman, The Dorvish Communist Party is firmly committed to achieving communism within the context of a constitutional and democratic framework. I acknowledge this point may have been less clear in the earlier part of our history, but it should be very clear now. We are not going to have anything to do with attempts to overthrow legitimately elected governments. Anton Weinreich General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |
Date | 00:53:46, November 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | Yeah, until one of your crazy supporters gets your job. Pfeiffer maybe. Or whatever that lunatic is calling himself nowadays. Alex Gluck Defence Minister NP High Chancellor |
Date | 01:10:13, November 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Kommunistische Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | My name is now Furīdorikku Faifā, in solidarity with the Hulstro-Mikuni speaking peoples in Hulstria. Furīdorikku Faifā Dorvish Communist Party MP |
Date | 14:12:31, November 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | Shut up you utter pleb. I can’t believe you’re still habiging around. Alex Gluck High Chancellor of the NP |
Date | 20:07:55, November 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Kommunistische Partei | To | Debating the Paramilitary Legilisation Act 4304 |
Message | Mr. Chairman, Yet again, we see the venom with which Alex Gluck and the National Party despise the working-classes. Furīdorikku Faifā Dorvish Communist Party MP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 186 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 413 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt |