We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Whig Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4312
Description[?]:
- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Appointments and requirements for government employees.
Old value:: All government employees have to promise political independence.
Current: All government employees have to promise political independence.
Proposed: Government employees are selected and appointed in a political way.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:13:21, December 01, 2017 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Civil Reform Act |
Message | we open the floor to debate |
Date | 22:31:49, December 01, 2017 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the Civil Reform Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The 'best man for the job' argument could be thrown from either side, but realistically there is always political bias regardless of the law. -Leonard Fisher, President |
Date | 02:56:05, December 02, 2017 CET | From | Civic Republican League of Rutania | To | Debating the Civil Reform Act |
Message | We are neither surprised at the Whigs' corruptness nor the Liberals' spineless cravenness. |
Date | 05:29:29, December 02, 2017 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Civil Reform Act |
Message | The CRL lacks the basic sight of realism expressed by the President, politics are always considered when selecting appointees, suggesting otherwise is an outright lie Winston Vernon Prime Minister of Rutania |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 346 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 261 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 143 |
Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |