Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:37:51
Server time: 02:22:08, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: R.I.4316 Religious peace act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kjerne

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4317

Description[?]:

Herr Huspresident,

With problems of order and unbridled behaviour having been reported from the southern areas, and clashes between Pagans and Hosians are feared, we think there is need for to take measures for not to support the elements that are stirring up this provocations.

-Atlas Skuldristen (Kj)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:53:04, December 12, 2017 CET
FromHedensk Allianse
ToDebating the R.I.4316 Religious peace act
MessageHerr Huspresident,

It seems Kjerne has "fallen back" in terms of their own ideals. It is only in the wake of recent events that Kjerne has decided that religous freedoms are actually ideals they REALLY don't want. This bill is obviously just a scheme by Kjerne leadership to push their opposition into the dust. Comrades, our fight is not with you, but it is with the evil Kjerne. We hope it is clear to see that they will betray themselves in the pursuit of power.

-Halvor Aandahl

Date03:35:41, December 12, 2017 CET
FromKjerne
ToDebating the R.I.4316 Religious peace act
MessageHerr Huspresident,

Our first duty as parliament and government of Kazulia, is that we can guarantee safety, law and order, and that the law shall be held equally for all.
Apart from this bill being prompted by recent unrest, these articles are not contrary to what we think is right for Kazulia.

Private organizations shall have the right to any policies they choose as long as they do not violate the freedoms of third parties.
Religion shall not be institutionalized, but remain a private and communal matter, and what must be regarded as a commercial enterprise shall not use the name of a religion to promote itself.
We make a cut between the concept of religion and commercial enterprise.
To be a minister of religion shall be understood as a layman activity.

-Rebekka Töffting (Kj)

Date03:54:30, December 12, 2017 CET
FromHedensk Allianse
ToDebating the R.I.4316 Religious peace act
MessageHerr Huspresident,

Why should religion remain a "private and communal matter"? Many people want to express their religion in a peaceful way.

What Rebekka Töffting is doing is redirecting the issue to making a "cut between the concept of religion and commercial enterprise." The bill proposals have nothing to do with this. However, what the bill really does is ban the wearing of any symbol of ANY religion in public places, as well as stopping any religion from growing by banning the promotion of these faiths. This is a clear violation of a Kazulians right to freelyfollow a religion.

One question we would like to ask is if you really want to keep religion a "private and communal matter", then why do you want to disallow religious authorities to recieve a wage? If Kjerne REALLY says what it wants, then why does Kjerne want the government want to INTRUDE on a religions private business?

One final question is why Kjerne wants to allow segregation. If Kjerne wants to stop religious and racial tensions, then why does Kjerne want to promote it by allowing this horrid and violence causing practice?

-Halvor Aandahl







Date15:59:04, December 12, 2017 CET
FromKjerne
ToDebating the R.I.4316 Religious peace act
MessageHerr Huspresident,

Yes, we guarantee a person the right to be racist on his own back-porch. As long as he doesn't force anyone to be there.
In practice, what it means is that people are free to form organizations for one or the other ethnicity, whatever the rest of us may think of it.
In relation to the Hedensk Allianse - they might be many draddwyrans. Some of them may want to hold meetings only for draddwyrans. Maybe that is a bad idea, but I think it is better to allow it, than to make it a criminal predilection. If it is not criminalized, I am confident they will get bored quicker and find some other interest to engage in.

It is true that these articles are an answer to recent events. We have sensed the need to make sure that religion shall indeed be expressed and promoted only in a peaceful way, and the situation is such that provocations and reasons for conflict must be minimized.
Part of this is disallowing the name of religion from being used for economic profit.
And religion shall only be spread from individual to individual, not by costly campaigns


-Roald Storstrand (Kj)

Date03:06:03, December 13, 2017 CET
FromKjerne
ToDebating the R.I.4316 Religious peace act
MessageHerr Huspresident,

The reports that we have gotten from the provinces look much better now, and we think there shall be no need to implement these laws.

-Atlas Skuldristen, Statsminister

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
        

Total Seats: 176

abstain
 

Total Seats: 17


Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "Proud Darnussians? Darnussian is an insult, nothing more! You should all try to be more like we are, the Narikatonites!" - Nikolai Shukanov, former Narikatonite politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66