Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:23:01
Server time: 05:36:58, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2192

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2193

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:32:31, February 28, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2192
MessageA very very intriguing offer i must say. But i must ask the Rightish Party, who where those that presented this. What has made this change. What makes you invite a Party (our party) that you have had such harsh argumentations with ? And where badmouthing has occured on both sides, it has been on numerous occassions that our intelligence has been questioned. ANd now you offer us seats in Government.

We would like to hear a motivation for this government, so we can now if the motivation is good and we can decide if this is good or not for the nation and party.

Date18:56:16, February 28, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2192
MessageWhat motivates me is the prospect of putting the past behind us and getting off to a fresh start. I am hereby officially apologizing publicly for all the statements we have made about you.

What made us change was actually DaVidian Monarchist Theocratic Party or whatever. They showed us that if we continued on the path tha we were leading, it would only lead to bigger extremism. We do not tolerate extremism and we have broken off our alliance with them. They are to extreme for our taste.

We are now in the process of trying to become more moderate and to have all voices represented. Granted, there will be times when we'll disagree but it is our hope that those disagreements can be talked about in a civilized manner.

We are willing to incorporate you into this cabinet as a means of a peace offering. We would like to start fresh with you and talk things through thoroughlly with you.

Those that presented this were the moderates in our party and the fact that they have just ousted the current party learder and have installed a moderate to lead it. We are still in a leadership shake up because of this and we felt that we must reach across the aisle and make amends to those that we have been opposing. Your party was the one that we had fervent opposition too so it only made sense to reach out to you first.

Date21:24:23, February 28, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2192
MessageList of how much we agree with parties.
1. Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists - 70 %
2. DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party - 61%
3. One Nation Conservative Party - 57%
4. Freedom Party - 58%
5. Rightish Party - 47%
6. Patriot Party - 42%

(BTW; why aint 3wide.com party removed ??)

So ideologically wise, we would disagree with this as the Rightish party and Patriot party disagrees with us so much, but we would guess that it has been a matter that opposing parties always must be against...

But we have to agree with all you have said this is a time of reconciliation, where we should move past the old diffirences. And we would gladly accept this peace-offering in that way, we want to have a better climate, where we actually can co-operate. And we will most likely disagree on many things, most apparent is the matter of centralisation vs decentralisation. But we are not against being in government with the Rightish party whom here has made a peace-offer, and reconciled, then we can move on forward.

Date22:14:31, February 28, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2192
MessageOOC: They were removed once. I guess he got it reactivated.

IC: We are grateful. May we at last begin a new era in cooperation between our two parties.

Date23:15:24, February 28, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2192
MessageIt's better then your previous proposal I guess.. It'll be considered.

Date18:34:08, March 01, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2192
MessageWe will refrain from voting, for now.. But we will vote shortly.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 198

no
 

Total Seats: 47

abstain
  

Total Seats: 54


Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented

Random quote: "The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all the people." - Noam Chomsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57