We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religous dress code
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2194
Description[?]:
After reviewing interesting ideas of other nations, HPP wanna create a dress code concerning employees in the state and for them who have a public function. They should no longer have the right to wear religous clothing. They represent the state and sould be totally neutral while doing their duty. As political independence is creved, as should religious independence. In all other cases, the choosing of clothes is completely voluntary, respecting other laws on this matter. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:30:02, March 02, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Religous dress code |
Message | This is a sickening bill. Vehement opposition! |
Date | 18:35:20, March 02, 2006 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Religous dress code |
Message | Full support. |
Date | 21:08:38, March 02, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Religous dress code |
Message | So what if a Jew wears a yamacha (sp?) in court? Or if a Muslim woman wears a burka in a library? Just because someone wears religious regalia does not mean that they will not serve their secular government functions. This is discrimination, plain and simple. What's with all the sudden attacks against religion? The CSP will fight tooth and nail for the rights of religious expression, whether that be Christian, Muslim, Jewish, or other. |
Date | 23:16:10, March 02, 2006 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Religous dress code |
Message | "yamacha (sp?)" - OED gives it as yarmulke; I use kippa We disagree with this bill for the reasons the CSP has outlined (at least the first paragraph). |
Date | 11:11:54, March 03, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Religous dress code |
Message | This has been changed to better suit the description. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 152 | |||
no | Total Seats: 212 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 36 |
Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
Random quote: "The goal of life is living in agreement with nature." Zeno (335 BC - 264 BC), from Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers |