Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:57:13
Server time: 23:02:46, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Klexi | luthorian3059 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Citizen Service Act of 4337

Details

Submitted by[?]: Council of Lords

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4338

Description[?]:

It is far too common today, to see able bodied young men and women standing idle without purpose upon completing their education. Those that do not pursue higher education waste away, lamenting the lack of purpose in life. This is the first symptom of cultural decline, the disconnect between the nation and her people could come back to haunt us 10, 20 or 30 years from now.

Meanwhile, our armed forces petition for more recruits. This is a chance to kill two birds with one stone, the Council has put forward a proposal to restore limited mandatory service during peacetime.

Another proposal we present is a reform of the officer corps.

Today, the only way to advance in the ranks of our armed forces is with field promotions based on merit. This sounds like a good idea does it not? Perhaps during war, but during peacetime this system does not allow officers to rise further than the rank of Sergeant except in extremely rare circumstances.

This has led to incidents where comissioned officers "sell" promotions to the highest bidder, in the form of staged acts of herosim.

One example is the scandal from two years ago, where Lt.Col. Andrew McGraw "sold" a promotion to Pvt. Ian Kessler, for 10.000 Likath.

I propose that promotions be decided by the ministry of defence, to secure the indepenence of the officer corps, and to secure that people like Ian Kessler do not end up leading units into battle.


Aemilius Bérain,
Lord High Councillor

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:54:31, January 24, 2018 CET
FromCouncil of Lords
ToDebating the Citizen Service Act of 4337
MessageRespected members of the house,

I understand that the most controversial part of this proposition is the issue of national service. Let me put your doubts at rest, the plan does not simply intend to force young men and women away from higher education and into our armed forces. The reverse would in fact be true, the service would only extend to those that do not seek further education, those that are or are seeking to become students of a recognized university.

So in effect one could say that this would motivate those that did not seek higher education before, might do so now rather than complete their national service, a gentle nudge in the right direction one might say.

It is planned to start out slow, with only four thousand (4.000) volunteers fot the first three years, after that between eight, and twelve thousand young men and women, not in education could complete their national service every year, earning good life experience and friends for life, as well as a healthy respect for our armed forces and by extension our nation.

Lord Aemilius Bérain
Lord High Councillor of the Grand Council

Date15:15:52, January 24, 2018 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Citizen Service Act of 4337
MessageLord Bérain,

I understand that your intentions are good, however the proposal as you state it would just be an unfair discrimination towards those that do not have the capabilities of enrolling in higher education and have to finish their studies after high school. Anyone that does not go to university can enroll themselves in the army if they want. It is a voluntary action and it is well paid. They can also do social work if they want, it is a voluntary action that it is not so well paid. What you propose would be forcing people against their will, and against their individual freedom, and that we cannot accept.

Our stance on the appointment of military officers is that it should involve the Government to some degree in order to prevent any attempt of autonomy of the army which could be potentially dangerous for our democratic system.

Ariana Ortega
Majority Speaker

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 80

no
   

Total Seats: 201

abstain
  

Total Seats: 144


Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures.

Random quote: "Judge me all you want, just keep the verdict to yourself." - From a Winston advertisement

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53