We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2062
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2063
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Protectorate Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Radical Centrists
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Protectorate Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the United Socialist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Protectorate Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Protectorate Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Radical Centrists
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:17:29, June 05, 2005 CET | From | Leviathan Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2062 |
Message | The SRP once again shows that the only thing socialist about their agenda is national socialist. |
Date | 16:48:55, June 05, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2062 |
Message | Though flattered by the attempts to bribe us with the position as Ministers of Defence we must sadly decline the offer. |
Date | 19:57:20, June 05, 2005 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2062 |
Message | hardly a bribe as we get nothing out of the deal. Mearly placing a party who we believe will do a job that we can support in the position. A bribe would suggest we ask for something in return. Since the cabinet can pass without the USP voting in favor, since we as usual do not ask or expect a cabinet member for a vote on an issue in return, where does the bribe enter in. |
Date | 01:31:43, June 06, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2062 |
Message | Scrap the previous statement, we totally miscalculated the offer made by the Protectorate Party. We humbly apologize. |
Date | 01:57:22, June 06, 2005 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2062 |
Message | Quite understandable, we just wanted to make our position clear. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 24 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 46 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "Non-violence is not a garment to be put on and off at will. Its seat is in the heart, and it must be an inseparable part of our very being." - Mahatma Gandhi |