We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.l. 02/4341 - Freedom Collective's Proposals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alleanza Radicale - NCD
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4341
Description[?]:
Lidia Luciani, LP: "Mr Speaker, as exponent of the Freedom or Libertarian Collective of LP, I'm here to propose a bill to break the chains of the moral doctrines and of the bigottery, a bill for a humanity of individuals free of costrictions and free to develop their own being and their own ethics. Many will be "outraged" by these our proposals, but the world you want maintain safe is a world repressed which worst instincts can only blow up with terrible conseguences due to repressions and constrictions. A process of liberation and awareness which should begin since the youth. Thank you" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards alcoholic beverages.
Old value:: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased and consumed anywhere, but only by adults.
Current: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased only from licensed sales outlets, and can only be available to adults.
Proposed: Alcoholic beverage regulations are not imposed by the government.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for everyone.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: All forms of pornography are legal for everyone.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The age at which a person is considered an adult (limited between 12 and 24).
Old value:: 18
Current: 18
Proposed: 16
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Legality of in-vitro fertilisation.
Old value:: IVF is legal and regulated in terms of the applicant's condition and procedural circumstances.
Current: IVF is legal, regulated and only available to married couples.
Proposed: IVF is legal and unregulated.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on surrogacy
Old value:: Surrogacy is legal, and surrogacy agreements are enforceable. Only altruistic surrogacy is legal.
Current: Surrogacy is illegal.
Proposed: Surrogacy is legal, and surrogacy agreements are enforceable. Altruistic and gainful surrogacy is legal.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding bestiality (performing sexual acts with animals).
Old value:: Bestiality is illegal.
Current: The government has no policy concerning bestiality.
Proposed: Bestiality is legal and unregulated.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.
Current: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Proposed: Adult individuals are allowed to own and purchase guns freely.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of video games.
Old value:: The government does not maintain laws as to age limitation for purchasing video games, although it does require a content rating to be clearly displayed on the box.
Current: The government maintains strict age limitation laws that require proof of age before sales of video games may be made.
Proposed: The government does not regulate video games.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:43:05, January 30, 2018 CET | From | Partito del Socialismo Istaliano - F.P. | To | Debating the P.d.l. 02/4341 - Freedom Collective's Proposals |
Message | An absurd excalation of libertarian dreams... Of which only libertarians can profit something. A society where everyone could detain a gun without a certification or where little kids go drunk around the streets instead of being at school is a society that's only desiderabile from who wants our country to fall! - Antonio Masci, Secretary of the PCI |
Date | 13:54:47, January 30, 2018 CET | From | Nuova Unione | To | Debating the P.d.l. 02/4341 - Freedom Collective's Proposals |
Message | Jafar Gani, ULD: We do not see fit to support this article due to two articles: the first one, as we believe that 14 or 13 should be the minimum age for biological reasons, as, if it would be passed in the current state, we would most likely be pressured to ban alcohol advertisements, And the third article, as we believe that only people that know how to use guns (and those after psychological tests) should be allowed to own them. If anyone is to. Now, we want to promote the use of tasers and pepper spray, as they were proven to be more effective and useful in such situations. |
Date | 00:53:15, January 31, 2018 CET | From | Partito Nazionale Democratico | To | Debating the P.d.l. 02/4341 - Freedom Collective's Proposals |
Message | Saajid Al-Rassi, PNP Leader, This bill just highlights the degeneracy spreading through the LP ranks and cultivated by their liberal-left "ideals". |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 45 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 359 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 198 |
Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |