We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Less Gun Laws
Details
Submitted by[?]: Klassiskt Liberala Partiet
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2195
Description[?]:
| After the SD finally came to their mind and helps passing more liberal gun laws, we find it is a good time to losen the restrictions even more. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:41:55, March 04, 2006 CET | From |  Statsråd Parti | To | Debating the Less Gun Laws |
| Message | Yes, let's have murderers running around with chainsaws! Brilliant! |
| Date | 22:52:18, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Klassiskt Liberala Partiet | To | Debating the Less Gun Laws |
| Message | I don't know where you live (and I don't care), but at my place, chainsaws are tools and not weapons. |
| Date | 10:11:14, March 05, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Fighter Party | To | Debating the Less Gun Laws |
| Message | Great lets have a killing spree, youre turning this country into a vastly dangerous place and if civil war breaks out looks like our military are gonna have trouble on their hands if we more or less give citizens rocket launchers and mines and bombs. |
| Date | 15:27:59, March 05, 2006 CET | From | Radikale Folkeparti | To | Debating the Less Gun Laws |
| Message | Thats incredibly stupid. Are you really saying murders don't happen now? And in the event of a civil war, chances are the Army and Police would be split as well, it's not as if criminals find it hard to purchase weapons now, given the proximity of the barbarian tribes to the east. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 35 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 48 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 16 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it." - Niccolo Machiavelli |