We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Power to where it belongs! - new Head of State, new National Church
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4353
Description[?]:
We have come to realize that the current King does not fullfil his role in a satisfactory way. We need someone who is fully devoted to God. We need Holiest Kutsalwrntukai as a leader of Vanuku. And right now, when the Holy Army itself doesn't have constitutional majority, the only way we can achieve this is to call the election and let people choose whom they ought to choose. Moreover, the present day churches are so corrupt. Vanuku needs its own National Church, and the Leader of Vanuku shall also become the Head of the National Church of Vanuku. Our church will finally be not something outside the state, but these two institutions will become united. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: Juhn IX Jezhrje'konak'aerzsrlji Konzsrljihiko yrzy Wrnukaék Konz yrzy Jelbijékaiék Mrjkai yrzy Drsmojrzataghék Krté Kshihiko yrzy Wrnukaék Knzknstaték Abshrmojadhiko yrzy Kutsalkaiék Lawrns-Wrntukai I-ék Brnk yrzy Heijikaiék Ol'itá yrzy Wrnukaék Frto yrzy Prnznrdék trzy Hefaék Jezbék yrzy Ibthoék inDuna yrzy Skwoék Yukatchuék Srnebrjohiko yrzy Banmek-Sntazedék Frtogad (His Gracious Majesty Juhn IX, King of Vanuku, Protector of the Jelbic Peoples, Heaven's Wolf Child, Sovereign of the Kingdom of Vanuku, Heir of Saint Laŭrenco I, Sword of the Righteous, Pater Patriae, Duke of Prinsenaard and Hefa, InDuna of Ibutho, member of the Sekowan Yukatchu, Patriarch of the House of Banmek-Sntazed, and so forth, and so forth)
Current:
Jezknstaték yrzy Jezhrje'konak'aerzsrlji Konzsrljihikoék BUNJAMÍN orzy Jelb'koékaiék Jezkonz yrzy Jelbijékaiék Mrjkai yrzy Wrnukaék Konz yrzy Beíték Mlé yrzy Brmék Shá yrzy Drsmojrzataghék Krté Kshihiko yrzy Mitoék Mirz yrzy Jelbék H'ánknstaték trzy Pnték Konzknstaték grzy Abshrmojadhiko yrzy Kutsalkaié Lawrns-Wrntukai grzy Brnk yrzy Heijikaiék Ol'itá yrzy Jelb'koékaiék Frto yrzy Nrlzisrlji kaerajoza Nrlzinyrsrlji yrzy Prnznrdék trzy Hefaék trzy Merlkaitakék grzy Jezbék yrzy Ibthoék inDuna yrzy Skwoék Yukatchu yrzy Srnebrjohiko yrzy Banmek-Sntazedék Frtogad (His Imperial and Gracious Majesty BUNJAMÍN, Emperor of the Jelbic Peoples, Protector of the Jelbic Peoples, King of Vanuku, Meleh of Beiteynu, Shah of Barmenia, Heaven’s Wolf Child, Prince of the West, Sovereign of the Khanate of Jelbe and the Kingdom of Pontesi, Heir of Saint Laŭrenco, Sword of the Righteous, Father of all Jelbic nations, Enlightened among the Unenlightened, Duke of Prinsenaard, Hefa and Merlkaitak, InDuna of Ibutho, member of the Sekoan Yukatchu, Patriarch of the House of Banmek-Sntazed, and so on) |
Proposed: The Leader of Vanuku and the Head of the National Church of Vanuku
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:46:31, February 22, 2018 CET | From | Zhtál-Merlkai Tjarziprta | To | Debating the Power to where it belongs! - new Head of State, new National Church |
Message | Mr Speaker, This is the best way to be rid of an undemocratic and autocratic king and elect a head of state and establish a republic. Whatever some parties feel about the role of religion and secularity in society, the king is currently head of this state without a single vote being cast for him and has a veto over policy being made here. This new proposed system will allow all parties to choose who is the head of state in democratic elections. And furthermore that head of state will not have a veto and we can move forward like a more modern nation. I therefore urge parties to vote for this, end the autocratic hold over our country and let the people choose who is our leader at the next election - whether that be someone from the Holy Party the Free Workers Party, the Centrists or another. Gus De Smet Republican Party Leader |
Date | 14:26:38, February 22, 2018 CET | From | Suadja Alktmn Grundnyr | To | Debating the Power to where it belongs! - new Head of State, new National Church |
Message | Mr. Speaker, What republican would change a monarchy into a theocracy?.. Furthermore there is no "National Church of Vanuku". Our nation is split between Ahmadists, Patriarchal Hosianists, Aurorian Hosianists and several other religions. Mr. De Smet is voting a cultist into power. Even the monarchist party here, that being us, would rather vote for a Governor-General or Premier than a cultist dictator. |
Date | 14:52:58, February 22, 2018 CET | From | Zhtál-Merlkai Tjarziprta | To | Debating the Power to where it belongs! - new Head of State, new National Church |
Message | Mr Speaker What the spokesperson for the monarchist party is saying is pure poppycock and scaremongering! We are simply voting for a new system which will allow us the parties - and the people who vote for us - to choose a democratically elected head of state at the next election. It could be a candidate from any party. At the moment we can't do that - the monarch's position is hereditary and because of his royal veto the king has the power to be a political force. That is not right or fair, particularly when he is biased towards one party and one ethnicity. This is a once in a generation chance - maybe once in a century, to be honest - we can shape our country here and now or keep the status quo and sink into the mire. Gus De Smet Republican Party Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 185 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 40 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat." - Don Reagan |