We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Digital Privacy Act of 2195
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2197
Description[?]:
| We must draw a clear line between the privacy of an individual and the security of a nation, the fact that a persons private 'activities' on the internet should be used to create a database of 'clean internet users', 'potential criminals' and 'criminals for certain' is against all moral principles. We label people according their internet activities without any real proof because after all the digital highway is not that reliable but more of a 'created and editable reality', second, we tend to 'violate' an individuals privacy, at home. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Internet regulations.
Old value:: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Current: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Proposed: The government has no position on who may use or what is published on the internet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:24:01, March 06, 2006 CET | From |  Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Digital Privacy Act of 2195 |
| Message | Hmm I don't know... Maybe we'll support. |
| Date | 22:07:27, March 06, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Digital Privacy Act of 2195 |
| Message | I will not support this proposal which is in favor of criminality. |
| Date | 01:09:04, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Digital Privacy Act of 2195 |
| Message | So let people traffic in child pornography and theft?? How utterly foolish. The AA will soon devolve into an Alcoholics' Anonymous organization. |
| Date | 20:21:51, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Digital Privacy Act of 2195 |
| Message | Are you politically correct LDP? Are all Rildanor citizens paedophiles LDP? |
| Date | 01:40:57, March 08, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Digital Privacy Act of 2195 |
| Message | I don't know what a paedophile is. If you mean pedophile, no they're not, but those that are should be tracked down and brought to justice whether they're online or off. |
| Date | 01:04:09, March 09, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Digital Privacy Act of 2195 |
| Message | its the same, and we don't track those down through the internet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 155 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 311 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 134 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "Difference of religion breeds more quarrels than difference of politics." - Wendell Phillips |