Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 02:07:39
Server time: 13:52:20, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): dnobb | JJOXICO | Kubrick2 | LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | Zogu | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2196

Details

Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2196

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:53:09, March 07, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessageC'mon PNF, vote before the bill expires.

Date16:23:37, March 07, 2006 CET
FromShuggoth Progressive Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessageI would invite the PNF to vote against this Cabinet.

You deserve more ministries than this! The SPP would vote in favor of such a Cabinet that gave the PNF their fair share of seats (and that included the SPP too hehe).

Date03:02:10, March 08, 2006 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessageI just want defence. If you give me a bill for defence, you have my support too.

Date09:16:02, March 08, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessagePNF: you have defence - why are you voting nay? With 409 votes we could pass a cabinet coalition if we excluded the PNF, but we don't want to.

Date09:55:59, March 08, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessageArticle 9

The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Partito Nazionale Fascista

Date12:38:25, March 08, 2006 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessageFine.

Date13:34:29, March 08, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessageI knew you were only bothered about defence, and didn't want to risk taking too much from LGP and SRP: but once this passes I'm sure we can negotiate a more proportionate distribution of offices, if you like.

Date00:40:59, March 09, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2196
MessageI'm like the PNF, as long as I have environment and tourism, I'm fine.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 462

no
 

Total Seats: 225

abstain
  

Total Seats: 63


Random fact: Players are expected to play the game independently and should not share their passwords or allow others to access their accounts.

Random quote: "The Revolution needs to progress. We as humans need to evolve into higher beings through better moral virtues. And we can achieve that if we clean ourselves from the immoral. Those who go against the Revolution, go against human progress and must be freed in the most humane way possible. That is why we introduced the guillotine." - Maximus Robertson, former Davostani revolutionary

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69