We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Women's Military Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Alduria
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2196
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women serve alongside men.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:55:35, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Jacobites | To | Debating the Women's Military Bill |
| Message | Why? |
| Date | 18:06:13, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Communist Party of Alduria | To | Debating the Women's Military Bill |
| Message | Why not? |
| Date | 18:09:42, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Bendiri Bandidos | To | Debating the Women's Military Bill |
| Message | Who will do my cooking ? |
| Date | 18:17:51, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Jacobites | To | Debating the Women's Military Bill |
| Message | IWO, the onus is on you to suggest why you think it is a good idea that the effectiveness and integrity of the Armed Forces should be turned upside down. And to the APF (or is it AFP), we could always bring back slavery? |
| Date | 18:20:59, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Bendiri Bandidos | To | Debating the Women's Military Bill |
| Message | Hmm - now there's an idea !! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 141 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 98 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 162 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: "Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither, in my opinion, is safe." - Edmund Burke |